An intervention on the subject of the SMR from Doicesti, today on B1.ro in Gabriela Mihai's show. In short: yes - the project is not cheap, yes - we can live without it, yes - many other things can be done with this money. The question is different: do we want Romania to be part of a new industry? Do we want to have the research-development-innovation (CDI) infrastructure and to focus on the themes of the future? Do we want to be integrated into the value chains of new industries (or at least... have a tangent with them) and participate in or host cutting edge projects? Or, as a state, we only focus on solving the basic problems, specific rather to the last century (water-sewer, asphalting, so bare necessities). So, backward-looking or forward-looking? There is a lot to say, but I think that if we follow the logic of "what we can afford", we would not even end up in NATO/EU. Therefore, if the project can be rethought in such a way as not to put too much pressure on the public money (eg: to attract international partners and external funding), it should not be thrown into the trash. Even if it went to the left in Romania, the project has its merits (technology is not in discussion) and should not be politicized. On the contrary, it could really be a good opportunity for Romania to position itself strategically in a new branch of the nuclear industry, of course if Romania wants something like that. See more
Read more »we do things differently
ROEC functions as a nexus between three “epistemic communities”: business, policy makers and academia